|
Credit Deficient
|
| Expected Graduation Year | Class of 2014 | Class of 2013 | Class of 2012 | Class of 2011 |
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % |
|
Carson City
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 110 | 19.1 % | 165 | 26.0 % | 128 | 23.1 % |
|
Churchill
| Graph | 1 | 0.3 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 8 | 2.6 % |
|
Clark
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 6,869 | 28.8 % | 5,793 | 25.4 % | 4,381 | 21.9 % |
|
Douglas
| Graph | 21 | 3.9 % | 102 | 16.6 % | 73 | 15.6 % | 16 | 3.7 % |
|
Elko
| Graph | 10 | 1.3 % | 161 | 21.2 % | 92 | 12.9 % | 67 | 10.0 % |
|
Esmeralda
| Graph | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
Eureka
| Graph | 1 | 5.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % |
|
Humboldt
| Graph | 21 | 7.3 % | 40 | 16.1 % | 30 | 12.5 % | 7 | 3.0 % |
|
Lander
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 1 | 1.0 % |
|
Lincoln
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % |
|
Lyon
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 19 | 3.0 % | 10 | 1.5 % | 24 | 4.0 % |
|
Mineral
| Graph | 8 | 20.5 % | 8 | 17.4 % | 4 | 12.9 % | 1 | 2.4 % |
|
Pershing
| Graph | 2 | 3.8 % | 5 | 9.8 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % |
|
State Public Schools
| Graph | 164 | 19.0 % | 128 | 15.6 % | 83 | 10.9 % | 45 | 8.2 % |
|
Storey
| Graph | N/A | N/A | 1 | 2.9 % | 4 | 11.1 % | 2 | 4.9 % |
|
Washoe
| Graph | N/A | N/A | 763 | 15.9 % | 1,019 | 22.3 % | 1,077 | 24.4 % |
|
White Pine
| Graph | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 0 | 0.0 % | 2 | 1.7 % |
Data as of: Count Day
This table shows the number and percent of students who are expected to graduate in a given year that are credit deficient. Because of the changes in law (NAC 387.659) that affect the way credit deficient students are identified, no comparison should be made between 2010-2011 results and any prior year.
District totals do not include state or district sponsored charter school data. |
| 'N/A' indicates that this population was not present. |
|
|